<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pie Chart Rant #2: 3D is a nightmare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tworivers.com/blog/archives/194/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tworivers.com/blog/archives/194</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:16:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Katy Gamble</title>
		<link>http://tworivers.com/blog/archives/194/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Katy Gamble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworivers.com/blog/?p=194#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Just because you can, doesn&#039;t mean you should.

Web apps are about getting the data you need to complete your work and not about, &quot;Oh, whoa!  Cool!  Hey Bob, check out this nifty 3d-chart.&quot;  Pretty sure no one goes home to show their family and friends a web app with 3d charts.

So, I&#039;m on board.  3d charts provide no extra value and just increase visual noise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you can, doesn&#8217;t mean you should.</p>
<p>Web apps are about getting the data you need to complete your work and not about, &#8220;Oh, whoa!  Cool!  Hey Bob, check out this nifty 3d-chart.&#8221;  Pretty sure no one goes home to show their family and friends a web app with 3d charts.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;m on board.  3d charts provide no extra value and just increase visual noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hagan</title>
		<link>http://tworivers.com/blog/archives/194/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworivers.com/blog/?p=194#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Great comments, Cliff... I suppose you could add information into the 3rd dimension of the pie chart (the thickness of the slice indicating something else), but I agree - the complications of the perspective view will make that information distorted as well - in fact, obscured. The front of the pie will make the back of the pie impossible to properly see (unless it&#039;s translucent? Ugh). I find it impossible to imagine a 3-dimensional pie chart that actually pulls that off. But I readily admit that my imagination may not be up to the job!

As for Office and Corel, it does seem that they&#039;ve gone out of their way to make the default charts 3-dimensional ... but all of the examples I&#039;ve shown are from web applications, where more choice is available. I suspect those teams just copied what they see in Office, assuming that it must be right. This is why I think all companies in leadership positions must really give UI their extra effort - so many people copy what they do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments, Cliff&#8230; I suppose you could add information into the 3rd dimension of the pie chart (the thickness of the slice indicating something else), but I agree &#8211; the complications of the perspective view will make that information distorted as well &#8211; in fact, obscured. The front of the pie will make the back of the pie impossible to properly see (unless it&#8217;s translucent? Ugh). I find it impossible to imagine a 3-dimensional pie chart that actually pulls that off. But I readily admit that my imagination may not be up to the job!</p>
<p>As for Office and Corel, it does seem that they&#8217;ve gone out of their way to make the default charts 3-dimensional &#8230; but all of the examples I&#8217;ve shown are from web applications, where more choice is available. I suspect those teams just copied what they see in Office, assuming that it must be right. This is why I think all companies in leadership positions must really give UI their extra effort &#8211; so many people copy what they do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff Tyllick</title>
		<link>http://tworivers.com/blog/archives/194/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff Tyllick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 03:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tworivers.com/blog/?p=194#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Hagan, in principle the only reason to give the pie chart depth would be the need to assign a variable to that dimension. In that case, the depth and volume of each slice would carry meaning.

But the complications of the perspective view would still give a distorted sense of the relative dimensions and volume of each slice. So a tilted pie chart is still a poor choice.

Unfortunately, when the user chooses to display data as a pie chart, both Microsoft Office products and Corel Office Suite products produce a tilted pie chart by default. You can turn the depth off, but it shouldn&#039;t be there to begin with. After all, there really is never a good reason to use a 3D pie chart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hagan, in principle the only reason to give the pie chart depth would be the need to assign a variable to that dimension. In that case, the depth and volume of each slice would carry meaning.</p>
<p>But the complications of the perspective view would still give a distorted sense of the relative dimensions and volume of each slice. So a tilted pie chart is still a poor choice.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, when the user chooses to display data as a pie chart, both Microsoft Office products and Corel Office Suite products produce a tilted pie chart by default. You can turn the depth off, but it shouldn&#8217;t be there to begin with. After all, there really is never a good reason to use a 3D pie chart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
